It has recently been brought to the attention of the Company
side of the Peacekeeping Task Force (PKTF) - a Federation-chartered American,
non-Federal, unincorporated service provider - that questions and assumptions are
circulating about its purpose, structure, and responsibilities. In light of
that, it’s worth taking a moment to clarify what PKTF is, what it does, and
just as importantly, what it does not do.
At its core, PKTF operates in good faith to provide support
services to both de jure and de facto governmental frameworks. These are to each State of the Union (i.e. (de jure) The Illinois Assembly, The Maine Assembly, The New Mexico Assembly, etc. This same service networking effort is owed to the (de facto) The State of Illinois, The State of Maine, The State of new Mexico, etc.). The same service
entities connected to this effort are responsible for supporting their Union
State (de jure) and “County of” (de facto) local governments. PKTF was formed
to network across these parallel structures - not to merge them, not to override
them, not to maintain oversight, but to help establish working recognition and functional cooperation
where it’s needed and that such is recognized lawfully and legally.
That role becomes especially important when you consider how these systems operate side by side, while others attempt to circumvent or assume jurisdiction (at times) over one another.
The States of the Union belong to the Union
States. The realms of land and soil exist in perpetual union as a matter of
nature, so that the sovereign Union States remain in constant joinder with
their States of the Union. In practice, the Union States present the government
of the nation-states within our national jurisdiction, while the States of the
Union represent them in the international jurisdiction. PKTF operates with an
awareness of this distinction and respects those boundaries in all of its
efforts.
Recently, during an international Town Hall
meeting - specifically beginning around the 2:55:37 mark and continuing through
approximately the 3:27:20 mark - statements were made that introduced unnecessary confusion
about PKTF’s role. These included diluted interpretations of its obligations,
along with assertions that suggested a level of authority or function that PKTF
does not claim and does not exercise. The individual making those statements
presented themselves as knowledgeable on the subject, but the organization itself
cannot identify the basis for those claims and does not recognize them as
accurate.
The Peacekeeping Task Force is not an oversight body. It is
not a federal entity, nor does it function as a subcontractor to any federal
agency. Comparisons to agencies like FEMA miss the mark entirely. PKTF does not
command, direct, or supervise State of the Union or Union State operations. Its
purpose is far more grounded: building lines of communication, encouraging
cooperation, and helping ensure that peacekeepers, peace officers, and first
responders all across the service spectrum, as well as those agencies and departments that manage and maintain them within the Federal and Federation of States, State of the Union governments, can be recognized and supported across jurisdictions - without
blending or co-mingling their roles.
A significant part of the confusion appears to come down to
a lack of direct communication from available lawful people from any of the 50 States of the Union. Many of the stewards and international
peacekeepers currently speaking on these topics at this Town Hall meetup simply do not maintain an active
working relations with the Federation’s Peacekeeping Task Force in proper form or function. That gap
matters. Without open lines of communication, assumptions tend to fill the
space where firsthand knowledge should be. Based on what could be observed from
the Town Hall itself, the majority of those listed in attendance - particularly
those representing states - do not appear to have an established service
relation with PKTF.
There are also specific claims that deserve clarification.
Statements made regarding radio equipment and communications capabilities do
not align with what PKTF knows from its own involvement. The development of
unincorporated American Peacekeeping Communications has been a separate effort.
While PKTF supports and advocates for improved communications infrastructure,
it does not own, control, or operate that system.
What is known, however, is that in the early days, radio
units were provided to the Continental Marshals Service. Since that time, there
have been ongoing good-faith efforts by the American Peacekeeping
Communications Service Director, the radio and network service provider (an actively developing American (not Chinese) network), to troubleshoot and restore those units
where they have gone down. According to available reports, repeated outreach
was made over the course of several months to coordinate repairs and bring
those radios back into operation. Those efforts, however, did not receive a response
from within the Continental Marshals Service.
It’s worth noting that the Continental Marshals Service has
always had a direct line of communication extended to their service through the
Administrative side of the Peacekeeping Task Force - the portion of the
organization that speaks with and works directly with all American
peacekeepers. This was made known through ordinary channels as early as January, 2025. This same open channel of communication was made official via the Official Memorandum dated November 19, 2025, which outlines
the communication protocol and liaison functions between PKTF’s Administrative
and Assembly liaising services for American peacekeepers.
Thank you to our readers who helped bring this rather unsettling Town Hall discussion to our attention. We hope this helps clear up any rash confusion that might have resulted from any efforts on the part of the Peacekeeping Task Force.
None of this is shared to assign blame, but rather to provide clarity.
The Peacekeeping Task Force remains what it was intended to
be: an unincorporated American peace-building effort focused on coordination,
recognition, and support. Its work depends on communication, and where that
communication is absent, misunderstandings are almost inevitable.
