Similarities
Mankind’s Rights and Freedom
Both the 2030 Agenda and the Declaration of Independence
emphasize the rights and freedoms of mankind, as well as the reality that
corporations have been provided with a "personhood" identified as
having rights "equal" to that of "human" rights.
The 2030 Agenda might be seen as somewhat grounded in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, aiming to promote equality and
non-discrimination. Similarly, the Declaration of Independence highlights
individual rights of lawful persons and their corporate entities having equal
liberties and the pursuit of life, liberty to enter into honest verbal and
written agreement, and property through happiness of those pursuits.
Vision for a Better Future
Both documents envision a world where individuals can
thrive. The 2030 Agenda seeks to eradicate poverty and ensure prosperity for
all, while the Declaration of Independence envisions a true corporate
coexistence of people through lawful and peaceful Assembly based on
Jurisdictional boundaries equality and lawful justice.
Differences
Scope and Focus
- 2030
Agenda: A worldwide initiative named as a "global" framework
addressing economic, social, and environmental issues with specific goals
applicable to all countries.
- Declaration
of Independence: A national document focused on political autonomy and
self-governance for the American colonies and future sovereign nation
states.
Implementation
- 2030
Agenda: Involves international collaboration, partnerships, and a
comprehensive set of goals and targets for sustainable development.
- Declaration
of Independence: Primarily asserts the - then colonies' - and future
sovereign nation states right to independence from British rule, with a
structured, bottoms up implementation approach for broader societal to
State Assembly self-governing necessities.
Content
- 2030
Agenda: Covers a wide range of issues including poverty, gender
equality, climate action, and sustainable development.
- Declaration
of Independence: Focuses on political independence and grievances
against British Territorial and Papas Municipal governance through acts of
usurpations through corrupt subcontracting service manipulations.
Caveat: Balancing Ideologies
Research suggests that balancing these ideologies can be
achieved by integrating principles of mankind rights and the potential for
maintaining sustainable development of corporate "equal rights" into
national policies without compromising nation state sovereignty. This involves:
Strategic Integration Approaches
- Fostering
international cooperation while respecting sovereign national contexts and
priorities
- Aligning
development policies with earth wide goals
- Maintaining
foundational sovereign national principles
- Creating
flexible implementation frameworks
Key Considerations
- Preserving
national autonomy and responsibility towards self-governing
- Promoting
collaborative earth wide problem-solving
- Ensuring
cultural and political sensitivity
- Developing
adaptive policy mechanisms
The United States of America (Unincorporated) can commit to
aligning its jurisdictional development policies with the 2030 Agenda while
maintaining its foundational principles. This approach allows for shared earth
wide goals to be pursued alongside national interests, helping to ensure that
neither ideology loses its essential character.
This is a well-balanced approach at honoring traditional
principles established by the framers of the New World where all who are born
upon the Land and Soil retain their sovereign responsibilities, while
simultaneously considering progressive viewpoints without disruptive tendencies
or creating hindrances.
