Peacekeeping Task Force Reaffirms Commitment to Due Process (Minimal Approach) Amid Allegations of District Assembly Involvement

PKTF Denounces Unsubstantiated Claims, Highlights Rigorous Vetting Processes, and Calls for Evidence-Based Accountability to Protect Integrity and Lawful Governance

 The Peacekeeping Task Force (PKTF) has released a detailed statement addressing ongoing allegations regarding its operations, particularly claims of involvement in "District Assembly" activities or improper training of individuals not aligned with Federation specifications. PKTF reaffirms its unwavering commitment to lawful governance, transparency, and adherence to Due Process (Minimal Approach) while calling for accountability and evidence-based reporting from all peacekeepers.

Rejection of Allegations and Call for Evidence

PKTF categorically denies any involvement, direct or indirect, in perpetuating "District Assembly" activities or hybrid jurisdictional approaches. Any assertions to the contrary must be supported by formal written evidence.

Allegations from two states remain unsubstantiated due to the lack of detailed reports. PKTF requires Marshals-at-Arms to provide at least a supplemental report if a full investigation is not yet complete. Verbal claims alone are insufficient and may lead to unnecessary confusion or escalation.

Due Process (Minimal Approach) and Avoidance of Slander

PKTF emphasizes that all peacekeepers must uphold the principles of Due Process (Minimal Approac). Any Marshal-at-Arms who reports concerns without first submitting at least a supplemental report must be prepared to verbally retract their claims if subsequent written reports fail to align with their initial assertions.

PKTF reminds all peacekeepers that slander, especially when documented in writing and leading to defamation of character, is a criminal offense. Such cases may be subject to investigation by a Jural Assembly if damages cannot be resolved through arbitration.

What is Due Process (Minimal Approach)?

A) 100% Due Process (Minimal Approach) is a Sea Jurisdiction process? Reserved for Federal Employees and Interstate Commerce. This approach to Due Process equates to approximately 5-8% of the Federal Code.

Conversely -

B) American Common Law = Public Law = Due Process. This process is initiated simply by declaring a claim against another man or woman regarding their natural rights and/or property.

The minimal approach to A) Due Process only refers to those details that pertains to Americans throughout the course of business and controversy.

PKTF fully honors this approach to Due Process and expects the same standard from all American peacekeepers. Upholding fairness and accuracy is critical in maintaining trust within State Assemblies.

Handling False Assertions

If any claims are made asserting that PKTF is directly or indirectly involved in promoting "District Assembly" activities without written evidence or proof, PKTF will take immediate action. This includes requesting a course correction and retraction of such claims.

Should a State Assembly lack a functioning Ombudsman Service to address these concerns, PKTF will escalate the matter to the Fiduciary Office for guidance on potential claims of slander or defamation of character under false assertions.

Vetting Processes and Training Standards

PKTF employs a rigorous multi-layer vetting process for onboarding Assembly Liaisons. This includes thorough questioning designed to mitigate jurisdictional conflicts, ensure peaceful affirmations of service, and align candidates with full adherence to the Federation Blueprint and The Federation of States goal towards honorable restoration of such means.

Yearly training programs are provided to Assembly Liaisons to support lawful State Assembly Militia operations while fostering peaceful governance.

PKTF is committed to continuously enhancing its vetting strategies and exploring new methods for screening American State Nationals who seek roles within their State Assemblies.

Accountability Measures

Marshals-at-Arms are reminded of their fiduciary responsibility to conduct thorough investigations before making formal allegations. Interim reports are welcomed as supplemental documentation while investigations are ongoing.

Unsubstantiated verbal claims that result in slanderous accusations may lead to further investigations by Jural Assemblies if not resolved amicably through arbitration.

Commitment Moving Forward

PKTF remains steadfast in its mission to promote lawful self-governance while maintaining transparency, impartiality, and adherence to public law. The organization will continue refining its processes to ensure the integrity of its operations and the success of American State Assemblies under the Federation Blueprint. All peacekeepers are encouraged to uphold these principles by ensuring accuracy, fairness, and accountability in their actions and reporting.

Safeguarding an American Federal Republic - Republican Form of Government: The Critical Role of State Service Protection Process Methods in Protecting Assembly Integrity and Leadership

 A full-featured article is in process on this topic as we move forward into the near year, and as more State Assemblies grow nearer towards Seatment status through proper validation.

A few things to know up front:

1) The Peacekeeping Task Force does not play an integral role in the creation of any part of functions such as State Services Protection method implementations for any State Assembly.

2) However, requiring the initiation of such best practices as part of the validation process is crucial for safeguarding assemblies that could negatively affect their State Border protection efforts from potential abuses and neglect early on in the Seatment process.

3) So long as any State Assembly is working on the development of its own State Services Protection method for such means as listed below, then validation leading towards official State Assembly Seatment can be provided.

Below is a detailed explanation:

 

An ongoing effort assisting with each lawful, future American State of State reconstruction:

At the state level, systems similar to those protecting federal employees' rights could be adapted for American State Assembly Citizens serving in official capacities. 

1. Protection Against Runaway Leadership

• Mitigating Risks of Command Overreach: A State Services Protection method could significantly help ensure that Assembly Militia Command Leadership operates within defined limits, preventing potential misuse of power or "runaway" leadership.

• Checks and Balances: The method establishes clear investigatory and procedural safeguards, ensuring that militia commanders are held accountable without arbitrary or unjust actions.

2. Safeguards Against Improper Recall or Manipulation

• Preventing Strategic Voting Manipulation: Without such a services protection method, malicious actors could orchestrate strategic voting to improperly recall or remove militia leadership for personal or political gain.

• *Due Process for Leadership: The process method allows for mandates of proper investigatory procedures before any recall, ensuring that leadership is protected from nefarious attempts to undermine its authority.

*What is Due Process (Minimal Approach)?

A) 100% Due Process (Minimal Approach) is a Sea Jurisdiction process? Reserved for Federal Employees and Interstate Commerce. This approach to Due Process equates to approximately 5-8% of the Federal Code.

Conversely -

B) American Common Law = Public Law = Due Process. This process is initiated simply by declaring a claim against another man or woman regarding their natural rights and/or property.

The minimal approach to A) Due Process only refers to those details that pertains to Americans throughout the course of business and controversy.

PKTF fully honors this approach to Due Process and expects the same standard from all American peacekeepers. Upholding fairness and accuracy is critical in maintaining trust within State Assemblies.

3. Increased Assurance for Assembly Stability

• Helps to Prevent Takeovers: By memorializing Citizens Rights and Procedures, the process method protects the Assembly from destabilization caused by internal manipulation or external interference.

• Transparency in Governance: The process method creates a clear framework for decision-making, fostering trust and reducing the likelihood of disputes.

4. Comparable Aspects of Benefits to that of an American State Constitutional Framework 

• As an active part of a lawful state constitution addressing service by lawful persons, such process methods can be found within them which offer guarantees to rights for government employees, a State Services Protection method entices future participation in Assembly service by protecting the limited equal rights of elected State Assembly officers while in office.

• Such methods help to better ensure current officers are retained by providing stability and protection against undue accusations or actions.

5. Validation as a Safeguard

• The requirement for evidence of a State Services Protection method, or one in measurable process at the time of validation, as part of the validation process ensures assemblies meet minimum standards of viable self-governance and best practices accountability.

• This validation procedure prioritizes long-term stability over immediate operational readiness, ensuring assemblies are resilient against manipulation and abuse.

By requiring steps toward creating a State Services Protection method, The Peacekeeping Task Force can assist with ensuring the Federation of States that all state assemblies are not only operationally ready but also structurally sound, with safeguards in place to protect their leadership and integrity against both internal and external threats.

Our research team will be providing more detail on this aspect in the coming days for your convenience and own research consideration. Details of that information will be found on our pktfnews.org site.