Key Differences Between Lawful State Assemblies and Other Groups
-
Definitely Lawful - Land and Soil Jurisdiction State Assemblies:
Grounded in the Tenth Amendment and state constitutions. Uphold natural rights, popular sovereignty, and lawful self-governance by way of the Public Law. -
Possibly Legal ONLY - Other sidebar Groups (Reign of Heaven, the late David Straight (limited arrangement) dual State National Process Groups (and other largely District Assembly-minded approaches), Republic of The United States of America (RUSA), etc..
Often lack a clear jurisdictional boundary framework or lawful grounding differentiation. Such tactics may rely significantly on private claims or alternative interpretations and not the Public Law or The Assembly of, for, and by the people, as well as of, for, and by The People who serve them.
-
State Assemblies:
Operate transparently with defined public record members of their Assembly or of The Public, clearly known service procedures, and public accountability. These same adhere to the Unanimous Declaration of Independence and all obligations that uphold the Public Law. -
Other Groups of a non-assembled fashion:
Typically lack transparent structure, recognized authority, an enforcement of the Public Law element answerable to the people, or established accountability.
-
State Assemblies:
Coordinate with Constitutional Sheriffs and other local local peacemakers. Provide training and education to uphold citizens’ rights and Public Law for all de jure men and women and their families' public and private assets. -
Other Groups:
May claim peacekeeping roles but lack recognized authority or coordination with lawful public officers, appointed officers, or the Federation and Federation of States.
-
State Assemblies:
Explicitly obligated to self-govern under state and federal constitutions. Serve their members and the State. -
Other Groups:
May claim self-governance but do not have lawful recognition or in-session and operate under the Federation blueprint with identified State Coordinators.
-
State Assemblies:
PKTF offers a unique, transparent listing and exclusive vetting process for Federation coordination regarding State Border Defense development. Only assemblies meeting lawful and peaceful standards, and that promote peacekeepers, are properly recognized. -
Other Groups:
No comparable public, criteria-based distinction or listing is provided elsewhere.
-
State Assemblies:
Emphasize public education, engagement, and accountability for both members and law enforcement. -
Other Groups:
Usually lack definitive mechanisms for ongoing public engagements with Law Enforcement and State Border Defense- or other external accountability offices - offering no counterbalancing.
What’s Next?
-
Reviewing PKTF’s educational resources for both citizens and law enforcement.
-
Participating in local Assembly meetings or peacekeeping training.
-
Reaching out to PKTF for clarification about the status of any group or office in question.