All hidden under the de facto corporate-veil version of Public Safety.
Our thorough research and field reporting will focus on the proposition that these systems operate through a public-trust framework rather than a conventional (two-party) contractual agreement structure (with full disclosure as being vital to being conscienable). Within that framework, we will examine Social Security as a congressionally established trust arrangement intended to serve the general welfare - not as a negotiated contract between the lawful individual and the de facto government, but as a system of public administration in which participants are identified, recorded, and administered.
A central question is whether this arrangement reflects a broader trust relation, or relationship (a type of body corporate) originating ONLY in the registration of birth and the issuance of a birth certificate.
Our current, and ongoing inquiries will explore whether those records do more than document an event: whether they also establish an administrative identity through which a lawful person then becomes recognizable within interconnected Municipal State of, state, and Territorial federal systems, and what are the limits and ramifications of being tethered to this particular trust detail. Related questions include whether a corresponding public trust is held or administered at the level described in this research as the “State of State,” and how that structure identifies solicitants and newborn baby (unconscienable) participants and accounts to those who clandestinely hold an interest in its unilateral administration.
The distinction at the heart of this inquiry is between the living person and the legal or administrative identity recorded in that person’s name. We will examine how that distinction is created, what purposes it serves, and whether people are adequately informed about the capacities, benefits, obligations, and limitations associated with their participation.
For too long, these relation"ships", rather than common relations between people and those corporations who serve the general public with genuine trust and honor, have remained obscure to the very people whose lives they organize. The purpose of this research is simply to shed a fair and balanced light on the subject matter that promotes the concept of full disclosure where there previously, and currently still remains, none to the general public (the general welfare). The Peacekeeping Task Force and its research findings are not meant to (and never will) presume that every trust or administrative structure is inherently unfair or purposefully deceitful. It is, however, meant to inquire whether its (the Trust) existence, purposes, and operation have been sufficiently disclosed - and whether participation proceeds with meaningful knowledge and understanding.
As this work develops, we will distinguish documentary evidence from interpretation and examine the underlying statutes, records, and administrative practices in greater detail. The starting point is straightforward: a structure that acts in a person’s name should be understandable to the person whose name it uses.
A special thank you goes out to one of our American researchers from BurnTheCorporateFiction - genuine content creator on the subject of the 14th Amendment subject and corporate identity exploiting the concept of Equal Rights (another manmade concept built for governmental exploitation).
