The State and Thier Local Assemblies- Simultaneous, Harmonious, Jurisdictional Existence
The growth and standing of both State and County Assemblies is not just a matter of organizational preference—it is a necessity for true self-governance, recognition, and community protection.
Far too often here recently, confusion, misunderstanding, or convenient non-comprehension leads to unnecessary delays, misplaced priorities, or even the accidental (or possibly intentional) undermining of local or state efforts. It is time to clarify, yet again how these two levels of Assembly development are not only compatible but inseparable.
The Power of Parallel Progress
When people from different counties across a state—whether meeting virtually or in person—work to establish their State Assembly, they are simultaneously supporting their own County Assembly. This is not just a happy accident; it is the very design of the American Assembly process.
State Assembly Standing provides both the lawful and legal diplomatic shield that allows County Assemblies to be recognized, protected, and effective. Without the State Assembly, in this instance, all of its counties are made vulnerable to international exploitation and potential encroachment.
County Assembly activity ensures that local needs, innovations, and realities are represented at the State level, enriching the entire Assembly structure. Without the County Assembly, the truest nature of State Sovereignty is brought firmly into question.
For those people from counties seeking to learn more about how to become a "Model County" is what the Peacekeeping Task Force is working to help provide.
Through the Federation Fiduciary Office - even offering to make ample meeting space to help answer questions is part of what the Resurgence Project is all about.
Interested folks from the various Counties across America actively involved with local Assembly development wanting to get ahead of the curve to help anticipate full State Assembly Standing and County Assembly Standing preparedness is another part of the strategy.
"The two are supposed to be experienced at the same time... as each State Assembly is developed, so too does each of the Counties that have at least one or more status-corrected man or woman who also, themselves participate at the State level especially within committee." — Anna Von Reitz
Addressing Common Concerns & Misunderstandings
No County Should Be Left Behind: Evidence shows that when a County Assembly is ready to stand but the State Assembly is not yet fully formed, there can be a perception that the county is trying to "centralize" or become the potential, interim "State Capitol." This is a misunderstanding in its current potential. Every county’s progress is a win for the state as a whole, and all counties should be encouraged to participate in State committees, especially when such work involves local growth bringing local experience and needs to the table.
No State Should Stall Local Growth: Conversely, some believe that "State Assembly must come first" (meaning must be fully standing and seated first) before any County Assembly can be recognized.
Not true!
While State Assembly Standing is absolutely essential for official recognition "first," county development, however, does not need to pause. In fact, the Federation has affirmed that both should be growing together, with county participation at the state level being a key indicator of progress.
"The 100% facts remain that when a State Assembly is being developed, so too are ALL the County Assemblies in a position to develop also - from status-corrected people who live upon them—ESPECIALLY if those people from each County ARE participating honorably at the State level, if only by Committee involvement."
Working Together—Not Against Each Other
State-level participants (elected Officers must not forsake their own counties. Everyone serving at the State level as elected Officers should also be extending (at least a small, yet measurable portion of) their efforts locally, ensuring that their own County Assembly is not neglected.
No county should think to grant itself a State Capitol location or try to overshadow other counties or remote State Assembly work . The Assembly process is about collaboration, not competition. Counties with more status-corrected people should share their experience and help to motivate the State Assembly collective work, not attempt to dominate State Assembly business or become the de jure "Capitol" location by default as a matter of manipulated convenience.
Committee work is the bridge. Every State Assembly committee meeting should include updates and outreach from local counties, and every County Assembly should be encouraged to send representatives—even if it’s just one dedicated, lawful and peaceful man or woman.
Simplicity in Action
It is incredibly simple for even a single man or woman in a county to:
Serve as a County Organizer, Peacekeeper, or Recording Secretary.
Participate remotely in State Assembly committees.
Share local successes and needs, and learn from others statewide.
Promote outreach and invite others from their county to join.
No Excuses—Resources and Training Are Available
Any State Assembly that does not yet have a Peacekeeping Task Force - Assembly Liaison (Point of Contact), but is seeking answers to these issues, should know:
Liaison training and committee support have been available since March 2024.
There is little to no excuse for not being more at ease with these processes, as ongoing training and support are available, and have been, and even more still is on the way.
Anyone acting as an American State National at the State level can receive training on how to build both State and County Assemblies side by side, focus on interfacing with Emergency Resource Centers, Offices, and Local Departments with State Assembly Standing being announced first, followed by County Assembly Standing as soon as possible—even if a county has been ready for weeks or months.
Avoiding the Trap of Circumstance
Let’s be clear: Potential exploitation—whether accidental or intentional—can happen when people accidentally, or conveniently misunderstand or misinterpret the process or try to "game" the system. But the solution is always more communication, more committee involvement, and more sharing of local and state progress.
If you’re working at the State level, please keep your own County Assembly moving forward- even nominal contributions will go a long way!
If you’re strong at the County level, participate in State committees and share your experience. Without local demographics analysis, State Assembly development becomes difficult to scale out from border to border.
If you’re alone on your county, you are still the seed of local Assembly growth—reach out, serve where you can, and connect with State committees.
"Counties are stronger together and our common purpose is enshrined... Empowering counties to work together for the betterment of one state is The Recipe for Success."
Moving Ahead—Empowered, Not Victimized
The path forward is quite clear: State and County Assemblies are meant to grow together, side by side, each supporting and strengthening the other with The State Assembly to be announced first Internationally. There is no need to fall prey to circumstance, confusion, or rivalry. With open communication, committee participation, and a shared vision, every county and every state can stand strong—recognized, protected, and empowered.
If you or your Assembly have questions or concerns about how to move forward, remember: training, resources, and support are available. The Federation and its Fiduciary Office have addressed these dynamics many times, and the process is simpler than it may appear.
Let’s continue to build together, honoring both our local roots and our statewide vision—never as victims of circumstance, but as empowered participants in the American Assembly process.
Much confusion is coming from what is being purported as "what Anna has said." For example: "A County Assembly can’t be formed until the State is standing first.
ReplyDeleteThis is per Anna." This is contradictory to what is stated in this article. Another confusion is what the State Assemblies perceive to be under their jurisdiction (land and soil jurisdiction State Assemblies) and role. For example, "No one from the PKTF contacted the official officers or coordinator to inform The Alabama Assembly that a Model County Assembly was being created. This was done without our knowledge and oversight." Is it the State Assemblies role to give oversight to County Assemblies as they develop. If so, what does that look like and how is that oversight process defined? Here is a quote from Anna: "Marion County is trying to exist apart from The Florida Assembly and that is a no-can-do for starters." I don't know what Anna means by that? I don't know if the information someone gave Anna about Marion County is substantiated by evidence of Marion County's intent to do what Anna has stated they are intending to do which she has apparently been led to believe. This happens alot across the State Assemblies communication to Anna. How do we timely validate these communications as substantiated or not, so that conflict, confusion, and misrepresentation do not continue to give rise to schisms when people stand their ground because they know what "Anna said?"